Rapid Momentum Consulting

A ten-question diagnostic of your organisation's distributed-asset safety governance — calibrated for operators of distributed estates such as fuel retail, banking branch networks, infrastructure sites, and adjacent multi-site contexts. Structured around the four operating disciplines: scope, methodology, closure, governance.

0 of 10 questions answered

Programme overview

1.How many distributed sites does your organisation operate?

100 or fewer
100 to 1,000
1,000 to 10,000
More than 10,000

2.Do you maintain independent third-party safety assurance across the network?

Sustained, substantive third-party assurance with multi-year continuity
Annual third-party audits
Ad hoc when issues arise
Internal assurance only

Scope discipline

3.Is the safety audit programme's scope explicitly defined?

Explicitly defined with rationale, and explicit exclusions named
Defined but without explicit rationale
Implicit, varies by auditor or region
Not formally defined

4.Is audit cadence calibrated by site risk profile?

Risk-rated cadence with documented criteria
Calibrated informally; rationale not always documented
Uniform cadence across all sites
Ad hoc cadence

Methodology discipline

5.Is audit methodology consistent across auditors and regions?

Standardised methodology with regular calibration sessions across auditor pool
Standardised on paper, no calibration
Largely auditor-discretionary
No documented methodology

6.How substantive is the evidence-capture standard across audits?

Defined evidence-capture protocols enforced consistently
Guidelines exist; enforcement varies
Auditor judgement determines evidence depth
Minimal evidence captured

Closure discipline

7.Are findings assigned to named individuals for closure?

Each finding assigned to a named individual, tracked through closure
Assigned to teams or roles, not individuals
Informally assigned
Not tracked to specific owners

8.How is finding closure verified?

Verified by audit team against documented evidence requirements
Self-asserted by site with periodic spot-checks
Self-asserted by site without verification
No formal closure tracking

Governance discipline

9.How structured is the multi-tier reporting cadence?

Site → regional → corporate → audit committee, with defined cadences at each tier
Two tiers (site + corporate)
Annual corporate report only
Ad hoc reporting

10.What visibility does the board / audit committee have into safety governance?

Structured periodic reports with substantive content and discussion time
Brief periodic updates
Only when significant incidents occur
Limited board visibility into safety governance

Distributed-asset safety governance maturity self-assessment

Programme overview

Scope discipline

Methodology discipline

Closure discipline

Governance discipline

Companion content